UNDERSTANDING STUDENT INTERESTA, ABILITIES ADN LIMITATIONS: THE CORNERSTONE OF EFFECTIVE EDUCATION

Authors

  •   Riantino Yudistira  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Utsmani Bondowoso,  Indonesia
  •   Rodiatul Hasanah  Institut Agama Islam At-Taqwa Bondowoso,  Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70412/itr.v3i2.109
 

Keywords:

Understanding, Approach, Student, Learning, Abilities, Limitation

Abstract

Understanding student interests, abilities, and limitations is fundamental to effective education. By recognizing these elements, educators can create personalized learning experiences that engage students and foster a love for learning. Interests are vital as they motivate students to participate actively in their education. When lessons are aligned with what students are passionate about, they are more likely to engage deeply and retain information. For instance, incorporating themes from students’ favorite hobbies or current trends can make learning relevant and exciting. Abilities encompass both the strengths and weaknesses of each student. Differentiated instruction, which tailors teaching methods to meet diverse needs, allows educators to challenge advanced learners while supporting those who may struggle. Regular assessments and observations help identify these abilities, enabling educators to adapt their approaches and provide appropriate resources. Limitations, whether they stem from learning disabilities, socio-economic factors, or emotional challenges, also play a critical role in shaping educational experiences. Understanding these limitations allows teachers to implement inclusive strategies that ensure all students can access the curriculum. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of interests, abilities, and limitations fosters a supportive learning environment. This holistic approach not only enhances academic achievement but also promotes self-esteem and resilience in students. By prioritizing these factors, educators can empower students to reach their full potential, equipping them with the skills and confidence needed for lifelong learning and success.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.

Coleman, J. S., et al. (1966). Equalit y of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Durlak, J. A., et al. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.

Elias, M. J., & Weissberg, R. P. (2000). Primary prevention: Educational approaches to enhance social and emotional learning. Journal of School Psychology, 38(2), 129-149.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.

National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2021). The state of learning disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5.

Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2017). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.

Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. American Psychological Association.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9 (3), 105-119.

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Pearson.

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.

U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Yudistira, R., & Hasanah, R. (2024). UNDERSTANDING STUDENT INTERESTA, ABILITIES ADN LIMITATIONS: THE CORNERSTONE OF EFFECTIVE EDUCATION. IHTIROM : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.70412/itr.v3i2.109